However, this only applies if teachers regularly apply the policy in their school curricula. If we do not, we are essentially telling students that the curriculum does not matter. Under contract law, if provisions of a contract are not enforced, the court may find that an offender cannot be compelled to follow a provision that the victim has not imposed at all. On a practical level, I soon discovered that teaching a class of twenty or more students must exist in a constant state of ambiguity. Trying to comply with the program as a contract often required distorting me into forms that I didn`t care about. Unchained, I completely abandoned the idea of a contract program and began to wonder why I had been advised to see it through this special lens. Sometimes the curriculum is either intrusive or obscure, or important policies are omitted. That is, the program remains silent on certain course information. Changes may be necessary, but they may not always be allowed. Some universities do not allow the program to be modified as soon as it is made available to students.
Students who are affected by changes to the curriculum that will be made later in the semester. B when an exam is cancelled, the final exam is no longer granted, or the weighting of an order`s grades is changed, they may complain and complain about these acts. However, in an article on a survey of faculty members and students` perception of changes to program components after the start of the semester, the results show that the majority of respondents prefer the program over flexibility rather than static preference2.2 If.B an award date coincides with the management of mid-term exams , the due date may be changed, but not the nature of the task. It is important to note that not all students with the manifest points are necessarily on board at the beginning of the semester. (Or even at the end.) You may have a different philosophy than I do, but unlike a curriculum as a contract, the manifesto leaves us room to discuss these differences. If you drag your program rules throughout the semester – just to impose them during the final week – students will ask, „Why me? Why now? Even old program elements, such as deadlines, have become complicated by technology. In the past, when a deadline for a task was mentioned in the curriculum, it was concluded that the assignment was due to that date in the classroom. But now, the ability to submit orders electronically via course sites like Blackboard and Canvas has forced teachers to be much more specific. 25 years later, in Yarchaski v. the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, a nursing student received a zero on a group presentation based on criteria and instructions indicated in the course program21. After receiving an erroneous rating for the alternative task, he was released from the program.
In his complaint, the student alleged breach of contract, violation of trust and fairness, violation of his fee rights and tortuous interference in a contractual relationship (by the teacher). The alliance of good faith and fair trade requires that people act in good faith and act fairly without breaking their word or denying what the other party has clearly understood. Although these are not legal documents, changes to curricula, which are punishable by students after the start of classes, would be contrary to the idea of a curriculum as a „good faith agreement“.